An inquiry has found that Bim Afolami, the MP for Hitchin and Harpenden, breached the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament.
The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards found that Mr Afolami had breached the Code by failing to register five of his interests within the 28 day deadline set by the House of Commons.
Mr Afolami previously told the Herts Advertiser that "no rules were broken", but has now said: "I fully acknowledge and accept that I have breached the rules, and I apologise for doing so."
The inquiry related largely to Mr Afolami's work as chair of the Regulatory Reform Group (RRG).
Mr Afolami had declared in the register of members' interests that he was being paid £2,000 per month to work for WPI Strategy, a public affairs firm, but did not initially declare that they were paying for him to chair the RRG.
After the Guardian made the connection, Mr Afolami contacted the Registrar, who believed that Mr Afolami "had not been clear enough" and "had not declared it properly".
Mr Afolami then updated his register of interests, and the Commissioner for Standards began his investigation into the late entries. Four of the late entries related to the RRG and WPI Strategy, while the fifth related to a private donation towards Bim Afolami's office costs.
The Commissioner found that Mr Afolami had "breached paragraph 5 of the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament" by failing to register those five interests within the 28 day deadline.
The Commissioner, Daniel Greenberg CB, continued: "Mr Afolami acknowledged and apologised for his breaches of the Code and confirmed that he had put measures in place to ensure the timely registration of future interests."
He stated that he "was satisfied that each breach was either minor or inadvertent in nature", and that Mr Afolami had "provided prompt and full explanations" for the late registrations.
SUGGESTED READING
- Bim Afolami steps in to help poppy sellers at Harpenden railway station
- More by-elections as district and county seats open up
In letters to the Commissioner, Mr Afolami wrote: "I apologise profusely for the slackness in my declarations here, and I am determined that I shall not fall short again.
"I confirm that I have accepted your opinion – particularly in relation to the lack of attention that I have sometimes paid to these matters. I am very mindful of the consequences for not being much more careful."
Speaking to the Herts Advertiser about the outcome of the inquiry, Mr Afolami said: “I have co-operated fully with the Commissioner during his investigation and apologise unreservedly for the late registration of some of my interests on the Parliamentary register.
"When I was first alerted to concerns that I had declared my interests in the wrong way I sought prompt guidance from the Registrar and ensured that any mistakes were fixed.
"I accept the Commissioner’s conclusions that I have committed minor or inadvertent breaches of the rules and I have since put in place measures to ensure that such mistakes do not happen again.”
Victoria Collins, Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate for Harpenden and Berkhamsted, said: "The number one concern of an MP should be to represent their constituents. Bim Afolami has fundamentally failed to do that.
“What’s more, having breached the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament, no wonder so many people have lost their trust in our Conservative MPs and government.”
"It is time for a general election. Our community cannot wait to see the back of another Conservative MP who has taken voters for granted and failed to stand up for the people who he owes his job to."
Elizabeth Dennis, a Labour councillor in Hitchin, said: "While Mr Afolami has been let off after a brief inquiry on failing to register his financial interests, there is still a serious question that he needs to answer.
"Does he work for his constituents, or does he work for the lobbying firm WPI Strategy?
"Constituents deserve an MP that stands up for them and their interests, and is committed to supporting them rather than serving the interests of lobbying firms."
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here